Article
Updated: May 22, 2026
Published: May 22, 2026
Paula Villalobos
Senior Manager
For many nonprofits, an audit is just another annual reporting requirement. Nonprofits expect that they only need to provide schedules and documents, answer questions and get a clean audit report at the end of everything.
Even organizations with strong missions, dedicated teams, and honest stewardship can be surprised by audit comments they weren’t anticipating. And the truth is, most of these “surprises” have nothing to do with wrongdoing. They usually stem from informal processes, growing pains, or documentation that hasn’t kept pace with the organization’s evolution.
The good news? These issues are common, manageable, and highly preventable. Here are a few of the most frequent audit surprises nonprofits encounter and simple ways to stay one step ahead.
For some nonprofits, teams consist of a handful of individuals handling the day-to-day operations of the organization. Small teams mean people naturally wear multiple hats and that feels normal. Unfortunately, when one person handles too much of a transaction from start to finish, auditors flag it as a risk even in close-knit, trustworthy teams.
Auditors understand resource constraints. What they look for is intentional oversight. You don’t need more staff, just smarter oversight.
Some controls to consider are:
Some nonprofit accounting teams think, if the money arrived, shouldn’t it be revenue on the date of receipt? Actually, it depends. Some grants are conditional, some are restricted, and others fall under different accounting standards altogether. Timing matters.
A little upfront documentation saves a lot of year-end stress.
Some processes to consider are:
Some nonprofits have more informal controls in place. Discussions are held, purchases, payments and payroll changes are approved. However, these are done verbally and there are no written trails to support these controls. Auditors, unfortunately, can only rely on what’s documented.
If there’s no audit trail, auditors can’t rely on it.
Next time you get transactions approved:
For some organizations, year-end entries are made quickly to close the books. Verbal discussions are held between accounting team members to correct a previous entry, accrue an expense or maybe record the pledge received at yearend. However, the documentation to support these journal entries are not put together and filed to support the journal entries booked.
When auditors review these entries, they need to understand the “why,” not just know the amounts. Auditors also look for proper approvals for these journal entries to make sure management properly authorized the recording of the entries.
Clear support builds confidence and speeds up the audit.
For each transaction recorded, make sure to:
The Board actively reviews financials and discusses them during meetings. However, minutes are not prepared after each meeting. As mentioned above, unfortunately for auditors, without documentation, that oversight doesn’t technically exist.
Strong governance deserves to be visible.
Next time the Board holds a meeting:
The accounting team thinks, if the invoice hasn’t arrived, the expense doesn’t need to be recorded yet. Based on accounting standards, however, expenses need to be recorded when incurred, not when billed.
Consistency helps avoid last-minute surprises.
Best practices to consider include:
Audit surprises don’t mean something went wrong. More often, they mean documentation or processes just need a little polish. With clear responsibilities, light but consistent documentation and periodic process check-ins, nonprofits can reduce audit findings, shorten audit timelines, and approach audits with confidence rather than concern.
A smooth audit isn’t about perfection, it’s about preparation. To learn how we can support your audit readiness efforts: