Nonprofit tax planning services.

years of nonprofit-exclusive practice

nonprofit clients served

nonprofit professionals

client retention rate

Strategy before the transaction closes.

Strategy before the transaction closes.

We advise on the tax consequences of new programs, revenue streams, entity restructuring, and major organizational decisions while options are still open. The scope includes private foundation compliance, joint venture considerations, and compensation arrangements with governance implications.

What filing season cannot answer.

What filing season cannot answer.

Most nonprofit tax work follows a compliance rhythm: prepare the 990, meet the deadline, move on. That rhythm works until the organization faces something its filing calendar does not anticipate. A new revenue stream that may trigger UBIT. A potential merger with another organization. A major asset disposition with tax consequences nobody evaluated in advance. Organizations that only think about tax at filing time discover these questions after the fact, when options for addressing them have already narrowed.

Board treasurers and executive directors increasingly expect their financial partners to raise tax questions while there is still room to act on them. That shift from reactive compliance to proactive planning is what this service is built to support.

Tax implications of new programs & revenue streams.

Before a new program or revenue-generating activity launches, we evaluate whether it creates UBIT exposure, changes the organization’s filing obligations, or affects its tax-exempt status. The evaluation happens while there is still room to structure the activity differently if the tax consequences warrant it.

Entity structure & reorganization planning.

Mergers, acquisitions, reorganizations, and the creation of affiliated entities all carry tax implications that should be evaluated before the transaction is final. We advise on the structural options and their tax consequences so leadership makes the decision with full information.

Joint venture & partnership tax considerations.

Nonprofits entering joint ventures or partnerships with for-profit entities face specific tax rules governing how income and expenses flow through the arrangement. We evaluate the tax treatment before the partnership is formalized.

Private foundation compliance & distribution planning.

Private foundations face annual minimum distribution requirements, excise tax on net investment income, and self-dealing rules that govern transactions between the foundation and its disqualified persons. We advise on distribution timing, investment-related tax planning, and transaction screening.

Excess benefit transaction review.

Transactions that provide an economic benefit to a disqualified person, including individuals with substantial influence over the organization, certain family members, and controlled entities, are subject to excess benefit transaction rules under IRC Section 4958. We review compensation arrangements, contracts, and related-party transactions to confirm they meet the reasonableness standard before they create excise tax exposure.

How tax planning fits into the year.

Annual planning session.

We review the organization’s anticipated activities, revenue changes, structural decisions, and governance developments for the coming year, identifying tax questions that should be addressed proactively.

Mid-year check-in.

We revisit the plan at mid-year to confirm whether anything has changed: new revenue streams, organizational decisions, or regulatory developments that shift the tax picture.

Transaction-specific advisory.

When a specific transaction or decision arises between scheduled sessions, we provide targeted guidance before the decision is finalized.

Year-end position review.

Before the fiscal year closes, we assess the organization’s current tax posture while there is still time to act on what the review finds.

The Nonprofit 
Leadership Exchange.

Related services.

Frequently asked questions.

Tax planning is a forward-looking strategy that anticipates UBIT exposure, evaluates the tax consequences of major transactions, and positions the organization before decisions are final. It is distinct from compliance filing, which processes what has already happened.

Filing is compliance: preparing and submitting required returns by their deadlines. Planning happens earlier, before a transaction or program launch, when there is still opportunity to shape the outcome rather than report it.

As early as possible. A merger, major asset sale, new revenue-generating program, or entity restructuring should be evaluated for tax consequences before the decision is finalized, not reconciled afterward.

No. Any organization considering a new revenue stream, a significant partnership, or a structural change benefits from a planning conversation before the change happens. The questions differ by size and complexity, but the principle of evaluating tax consequences before they become fixed applies broadly.

An excess benefit transaction generally occurs when an applicable tax-exempt organization provides an economic benefit to a disqualified person that exceeds the value the organization receives in return. This can include unreasonable compensation as well as other transactions or transfers of economic benefits involving individuals who have substantial influence over the organization, certain family members, or controlled entities.

Under IRC Section 4958, excise taxes may be imposed on the disqualified person who receives the excess benefit and, in certain circumstances, on organization managers who knowingly participate in the transaction. The disqualified person is also generally required to correct the excess benefit transaction.